Friday, April 17, 2009

Separation of Church and Sport

"I'd just like to first start off by thanking my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, who gave me the ability to play football and gave me a great family and a support group and great coaches and everything around me."

Those were the words of Tim Tebow, the University of Florida's star quarterback, moments after realizing he had won the Heisman Trophy, the annual award given to the most outstanding player in college football.

With run-on sentences like that, it's clear Tebow isn't an English major. He is, however, a great leader. In three years at UF, "Timmy" has won two National Championships, one Heisman Trophy, and the hearts of many. With one year of eligibility remaining, some are already claiming that Tebow is the greatest college football player ever.

In his spare time -- which there isn't much of -- he gives motivational speeches and preaches The Word of God to children, inmates, and anyone else in need of guidance. And mind you, this is a twenty-one year-old we're talking about.

Tebow went back to his birthplace, the Philippines, last year for spring break. Instead of a trip to Cabo, Cancun or South Beach, he visited underdeveloped regions of his homeland. While there he spread The Word, hung out with young kids and helped doctors and nurses perform their duties.

Tim Tebow is what every parent wants in a child: hard-working, driven and selfless. The girls want him. The guys want to be him. Essentially, Tebow is a cross between Brett Favre and the Pope. And he's humble about it.

Like most Americans, Tim Tebow is Christian. If you know anything about the guy, you know about his love and appreciation for Jesus Christ. After every win, every accolade, Tebow is quick to thank his "Lord and Savior." And since he seemingly wins everything, he's eternally giving thanks.

But this kind of thing gets me thinking: why are we so accepting of these public displays of affection for Jesus? I know Christianity is the religion of choice in America, but would we be so accepting if a guy like Tebow had different beliefs?

For instance, let's imagine that -- instead of being a Bible-thumping Christian -- Tebow is a Qur'an-thumping Muslim. Neither his play on the field nor his actions off it change in the least. However, the opening to his Heisman speech gives eternal thanks to Allah. He points to Him, his God, and the teachings of Islam as the reason for his success in life.

How do you think that speech would have gone over with Americans? You'd be naive to think that Tebow wouldn't receive endless hate mail, a handful of death threats and far less positive attention from the mainstream media. Don't think so? Ask Muhammad Ali.

Ali was a once-in-a-generation sports figure. His boisterous personality was decades ahead of his time. Some called it show-boating. Others called it disrespectful, or disgraceful. And to some degree it may have been. But in defense of Ali, boxing is a sport where the objective is to punch your opponent into submission. A little trash-talk can go a long way in mentally defeating the other guy.

As for his performance in the ring, Muhammad Ali was unmatched. His unique style, exceptional stamina and will to win made him The Greatest. And although this claim is widely accepted by the average sports fan, many young people are unaware that Ali was banned from fighting on American soil for three years. He was stripped of his boxing license after refusing to fight in Vietnam, a conflict he saw as inhumane, stating that war was against his religion.

Ali and Tebow are alike in many ways: Both earned immediate respect within their sports from a young age. Both have used their fame in positive ways, donating much of their time to causes greater than themselves. Both, to this day, display unwavering faith in their God. And oddly, both became huge stars at a time when Islam was mistaken by many in our nation as the Anti-America.

Islam isn't the evil entity that our media makes it out to be. The bad guys, so to speak, are the Taliban, a group of radicals that happen to be Sunni Islamists. And to condemn all Muslims for the actions of a few is wrong. That would be like a predominantly Muslim nation hating all Christians because a small group of Catholics decided to terrorize their country a few times.

America has misunderstood Islam for generations. In the sixties White America denounced Islam because they believed that The Nation of Islam -- which they called the Black Muslims -- were against the white man. And because Ali began practicing Islam around that time, White America considered Ali an enemy.

Here's a little-known fact: The Nation of Islam had good intentions. It was formed to enlighten, encourage and support young African-Americans. It was formed to give people hope - which, ironically, is one of the theological virtues of Christianity. But many Americans could not make the connection then and do not make the connection now.

I'd like to make a few things clear: I'm not necessarily against overt professions of faith. Nor am I against faith itself. But I am against discrimination. I am against hypocrisy. If a Christian -- especially a white Christian -- is vocal about his or her faith, that person is praised as "holy" and immediately categorized as a good person. On the other hand, a minority is stereotyped in a more negative light.

I believe in balance above all things. And unfortunately, we live in an imbalanced world where things we aren't familiar with are often considered inferior. Too often we find that new ideas are neglected because people lack familiarity. How can the "leaders of the free world" be so ignorant?

I suggest American athletes keep their faith out of the sports realm. I'm all for freedom of speech - but as long as the intolerant remain so, we won't have religious equality. And honestly, is God the reason why an athlete finds success in athletics? He doesn't run suicide drills, lift weights or watch film. Why would God help an athlete win a meaningless sporting event? Doesn't He have better things to do, like save a starving child or stop an epidemic?

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

No Doubt

Roy Williams left Lawrence, Kansas in 2003 to become the head coach at his alma mater, the University of North Carolina. At the time, Williams was considered the greatest coach to never win a National Championship. Until he did.

Within two seasons he was cutting down the nets as he led North Carolina to their first title in over a decade. But despite his outstanding resume, some remained critical of the now Hall of Fame coach.

They pointed to the fact that Matt Doherty, Williams' predecessor, was the man that brought Sean May, Raymond Felton and Rashad McCants -- three former McDonald's All-Americans -- to Chapel Hill. The critics wanted to see Williams win it all with a team he recruited.

It should be noted that the highest draft pick from that championship-winning team was freshman Marvin Williams, a Roy Williams recruit. Furthermore, Earl "J.R." Smith was also part of Carolina's 2004 recruiting class before changing his mind and going pro. He, too, would have been a freshman on UNC's title team.

Following their 2005 National Title run, most people assumed that Carolina was going to take a serious step back the following season. What kind of team can lose their top seven scorers and still be competitive the following year? A Roy Williams-led team, of course.

Coach Williams was able to fill the shoes of May, Williams, McCants and Felton with Tyler Hansbrough, Marcus Ginyard, Danny Green and Bobby Frasor through the 2005 recruiting season. You know things are good when you can bring in three high school All-Americans in the same year.

That group, led by Tyler Hansbrough, became the framework for the next four seasons. It didn't hurt that the 2006 recruiting class was equally great, either. That class also featured three McDonald's All-Americans -- Brandan Wright, Wayne Ellington and Ty Lawson -- who played as much a part in Carolina's success as the class that preceded them.

These two groups helped silence the critics by improving year after year, including three consecutive ACC Titles and this year's National Title. I guess Ole Roy can win with a team of his own after all. So much for the doubters...

Thursday, April 2, 2009

Rex Who?

Today, within thirty minutes, the Chicago Bears traded for Jay Cutler and signed Orlando Pace, two Pro Bowl-caliber players. While these moves are surely upgrades from last season, I wonder: Are the Bears now a contender in the NFC?

It may be too early to tell - but at this point, I don't see why not.

Jay Cutler has a greater resume, better mobility, and a far superior arm to that of his predecessor, Kyle Orton. This trade was a no-brainer for Chicago. As long as I've watched football the Bears have lacked a premier quarterback. Until now.

As for the tackle position, the Bears are replacing their worst offensive lineman with one of the league's best. John St. Clair allowed 9.75 sacks last year for the Bears, ranking 30th among left tackles. Pace, on the other hand, tied for 3rd, allowing just two sacks. Talk about no-brainers....

These additions aren't the only thing the Bears have going for them, though.

Last year's class of rookie running backs was outstanding. They were so good, in fact, that three rookie backs rushed for over 1,000 yards - none of which were named Mendenhall, none of which hail from The University of Arkansas. One could argue that the best of the bunch played for the Bears - and rightfully so.

Their young back, Matt Forte, was solid last year. Okay, maybe solid is an understatement. He was great. Very few rookie backs can step into a starting role, touch the ball 369 times, make it through a 16-game schedule, and most importantly, produce at a high level. Actually, that's quite a feat for anyone.

Forte led all rookies in touches (by far), total yards, and total touchdowns. One thing that Jay Cutler didn't have in Denver was a dependable running game. A good running game takes pressure off the passing game. And for a big-armed quarterback like Cutler, it can pay huge dividends. Remember what Brett Favre was like when he had good backs in Green Bay?

There's another thing Jay Cutler was missing in Denver: a good defense. When a defense can hold the opposition to only a couple scores, there is much less pressure on the offense. And less pressure on the offense can translate into greater flexibility when both calling and executing plays.

Defensively, the Broncos have been abysmal the past two seasons - Cutler's two seasons as a full-time starter. As the offense developed, the defense deteriorated in Denver. And although the Chicago defense -- for the first time in years -- was only average in '08, they're still a solid group. I have faith in any unit that features Tommie Harris, Lance Briggs and Brian Urlacher.

Still, some won't be sold on the Bears. They'll point to their lack of offensive weapons. But as I discussed with someone the other day, Trent Dilfer (who wasn't exactly a HOFer in his own right) won a Super Bowl with Qadray Ismail and Jermaine Lewis at wide receiver. Or, how about Drew Brees? None of us knew who Marques Colston was coming out of Hofstra. And for that matter, who thought Lance Moore and Devery Henderson would combine for 1,700-plus yards and 13 TDs last year? Yet the Saints continue to have one of the most explosive offenses in the league.

For some teams, a couple tight ends and a dual-threat back can make up for whatever is missing at receiver. I believe Chicago can be one of those teams.

The nucleus of this club is only a couple years removed from a Super Bowl appearance. And they got there with Rex Grossman. I'm not picking them to win the NFC just yet, but if recent history has taught us anything it's that any team can come out of the NFC. I mean, c'mon, if the Arizona Cardinals can go 9-7 in the pathetic NFC West -- scoring only one more point than they allowed last year -- and win the conference, anyone can do it.

The Bears were 9-7 last season as well, they've dramatically improved their offense, and as we all know, defense wins championships. And this team surely knows how to play defense. While they may still be a few years away, they've absolutely made a statement today with these big-time acquisitions. I would bet on the Bears winning the division this season.

Another thing I would bet on is Jay Cutler. He'll prove to be a winning quarterback this year. He may not light up the fantasy scoreboards right away, but he should have an impressive season.

Lovie Smith won't be missing his old buddy, Rex Grossman. That's for damn sure. Because after all, Jay is his quarterback. And I don't think anyone will question that decision.